rfbProcessClientProtocolVersion: not a valid RFB client
Jonas Bark
jonas.bark "at" gmx.de
Fri Mar 30 13:04:01 2007
Thank you for this answer.
Do you mean display with disable? If so, if I connect through a Web
Browser from the Psion, it shows "RFB 003.003" to me. But whatever I do,
wether through a web browser or a VNC Client it always says the same:
30/03/07 13:59:45 Got connection from client 192.168.10.105
30/03/07 13:59:45 rfbProcessClientProtocolVersion: not a valid RFB client
30/03/07 13:59:45 Client 192.168.10.105 gone
30/03/07 13:59:45 Statistics:
30/03/07 13:59:45 framebuffer updates 0, rectangles 0, bytes 0
The Psion only supports Java 1.1 but actually it worked great on Windows
XP.
Any Ideas left?
Thank you, Jonas
> Jonas,
>
> Why would you want to "disable the protocol check"? Then you'd just
> have a
> VNC Viewer trying to talk RFB to something that doesn't understand RFB!
>
> The first thing to try is using "telnet" or a web browser to connect
> to the
> VNC server's RFB port. This should disable one of "RFB 003.003", "RFB
> 003.007" or "RFB 003.008". If it displays anything not starting with
> "RFB"
> then, as the error messages suggests, you are attempting to connect to
> something that's not an RFB server.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: vnc-list-admin "at" realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-admin "at" realvnc.com]
>> On Behalf Of Jonas Bark
>> Sent: 29 March 2007 17:18
>> To: vnc-list "at" realvnc.com
>> Subject: rfbProcessClientProtocolVersion: not a valid RFB client
>>
>> Hello,
>> I tried to connect my Psion machine with the VNC Server under
>> Ubuntu/Linux and received those messages in the log files.
>> On the Psion I use the TightVNC client from
>> http://utopia.knoware.nl/~hlub/rlwrap/ or the one from
>> http://www.geocities.com/giulopresti/handhelds/vnc-epoc.html No other
>> viewer are working.
>> The messages are the same. I know that both are very old but it
>> actually worked with a TightVNC server from Windows XP.
>>
>> So may I disable this Protocol check somehow?
>>
>> Thank you, Jonas
>> __________________