e9925248 "at" student.tuwien.ac.at
Tue Jan 31 21:45:01 2006
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:47:52PM -0000, James Weatherall wrote:
> Have you fixed your patches as per our previous discussion regarding use of
> a security type to introduce custom authentication methods?
No, I have not found time to do it yet and I am not sure, how I will do it.
The solution, that I favour, is to create a chooser security type, which does basically
the same as processSecurityTypesMsg(), but uses a bigger name space (eg. 4 byte) and supports Client
side preferences. My other security types will get number beyond 256 and will be registered only
in the chooser.
mfg Martin Kvgler