Real VNC Speed

[Hal Vaughan]

On Friday 02 December 2005 09:21 pm, James Weatherall wrote:
> Hal,
>
> The standard VNC server uses the ZRLE compression scheme over slow
> links, which is higher performance in virtually all cases than the Tight
> encoding.
>
> What specifically is the "slow" behaviour that you are seeing?

It *seemed* like with Real, that I was beginning to see delays when I double 
clicked on icons before the screen showed the full window, fully updated, but 
I'm not sure.  It could also be slower connections, or just my imagination.  
I'm asking because I was looking for compression settings and some info and 
didn't find ay.

As I said, I was wondering if it was my imagination.  I'm more than willing to 
accept that it was.  I'm sure you know what I mean -- you change something, 
just a small thing, and your mind plays tricks on you, when you think that 
something's changed.

Thanks for the assurance! ;-)

Hal

> Regards,
>
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
>
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > I have worked with a few people who had TightVNC servers on their system,
> > using either the TightVNC or RealVNC viewer on my system.  Recently I've
> > worked with some people using the RealVNC server (the latest version).
> >
> > Is it my imagination, or is the RealVNC server slower?  Does it use
> > compression to speed up transmission, like TightVNC?
> >
> > Just wondering if it's my imagination or not.
> >
> > Hal
> > _______________________________________________
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > VNC-List "at" realvnc.com
> > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> VNC-List mailing list
> VNC-List "at" realvnc.com
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list