Scott C. Best
sbest "at" best.com
Tue Apr 19 15:18:01 2005
Sorry for the confusion. I just meant for him to *try*
EchoVNC, to see what its GUI responds with. The expriment is the
equivalent of "telnet localhost 5900", of course.
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, James Weatherall wrote:
> Unless I've missed a mail somewhere, Michael isn't using EchoVNC. It's most
> likely that his server is either configured to only accept connections from
> the local host, configured for a different port than 5900 or was unable to
> listen for connections for some reason.
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.