What good is VNC's GPL?
esoderquist "at" mcstamp.com
Tue Apr 5 15:02:00 2005
or both together...
From: vnc-list-admin "at" realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-admin "at" realvnc.com] On
Behalf Of Angelo Sarto
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 08:59
To: James Weatherall
Cc: Bob Smith; Kyle McDonald; yury "at" s-code.com;
adam.moore.scode "at" gmail.com; vnc-list "at" realvnc.com
Subject: Re: What good is VNC's GPL?
My apologies for the misinformation then, it can be pursued by *any*
copyright holder. I guess in this case tightvnc is a derived work of
realvnc, so either one would have the option of pursuing this.
On Apr 5, 2005 7:48 AM, James Weatherall <jnw "at" realvnc.com> wrote:
> I'm afraid you are incorrect. The copyright holders in this instance
> numerous and include RealVNC Ltd. Relatively speaking, only a small
> proportion of the TightVNC codebase is actually specific to TightVNC.
> Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> > However, if this matter is a violation then the orginazation
> > that initates the action has to be the copyright holder whos
> > licensing is being violated In this case this would be the
> > tightvnc group, who can choose to ask the FSF for help if
> > necessary.
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List "at" realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit: