On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 07:58:48AM -0500, Angelo Sarto wrote: > My apologies for the misinformation then, it can be pursued by *any* > copyright holder. I guess in this case tightvnc is a derived work of > realvnc, so either one would have the option of pursuing this. (Plus any/all of the other copyright holders.) Tim. */ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]