TightVNC vs. RealVNC (was Re: Another question about
Cadence
Benjamin J. Weiss
Benjamin@Weiss.name
Fri Jun 13 13:24:01 2003
So what's the expected date for the new release? :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "James ''Wez'' Weatherall" <jnw@realvnc.com>
To: <vnc-list@realvnc.com>
Cc: <Benjamin@Weiss.name>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: TightVNC vs. RealVNC (was Re: Another question about Cadence
> > RealVNC seemed to have an overall faster transfer rate, in that the
first
> > screen just popped right up. However, TightVNC had a faster *feel*,
> because
> > the RealVNC client would "freeze" whenever a large amount of data was
> being
> > transferred. Whenever a large screen update was being made, the mouse
> > stopped responding and the client wouldn't perform the local screen
update
> > until it had all of the image data.
>
> Ben,
>
> This is a well-known flaw of the old Windows VNCViewer, and is fixed in
the
> upcoming release.
>
> Watch this space... :)
>
> --
> Dr. James "Wez" Weatherall
> RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com - The Home of VNC