ZNC based on TightVNC

Dave Dyer ddyer "at" real-me.net
Sat, 02 Mar 2002 09:24:37 +0000


>I don't suppose you might consider using TightVNC instead of WinVNC as your 
>base code, would you? TightVNC is actively being developed, has many more 
>features, less bugs and is more stable than WinVNC.

I have made the "please incorporate this technology" overture
to both VNC and TightVNC, but there has been no response.  Lobby them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mail majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------