RichardC "at" pcgsystems.co.uk
Tue Jun 11 08:23:01 2002
Alternatively you can use SSH if you want to do it securely.
From: Alex K. Angelopoulos [mailto:alex "at" bittnet.com]
Sent: 11 June 2002 01:47
To: vnc-list "at" realvnc.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
This is a big problem for Windows remote control tools due to the way that
screen buffering is done; definitely much slower.
What I personally tend to do if I'm going to work in a console window,
is use a telnet server on the remote system. I know it's not as nice as
it integrated, but I've yet to see a GUI client that can handle character
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry Prins" <sentinel "at" optonline.net>
To: <vnc-list "at" realvnc.com>
Sent: Monday, 2002-06-10 14:12
Subject: (no subject)
> I currently use "pcAnywhere" to support my clients and have found that
> do not support full screen dos. I've been looking around for alternate
> solutions and have found your program to be very efficent execpt that it
> also does not support full screen dos.
> Due to the fact that full screen dos moves much faster then a window dos
> is there any thought being put into full screen dos support? There is
> approxamately a 65-80% slow down when running some applications in a
> mode compared to full screen dos mode.
> simply do a directory on two identical computers next to each other one
> full screen and one in a window and you'll see.
> Just some food for thought from someone who does a lot of dos work.
> VNC-List mailing list
> VNC-List "at" realvnc.com
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List "at" realvnc.com
This message and its contents are confidential and may be legally
privileged. The contents are solely for the attention of the recipient(s)
named above and unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution is