TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?

[Alain LaBonté]

Does that mean that you use plain VNC rather than TightVNC for fast 
connections?

Very interested by the answer. I plan to use TightVNC. I am just wondering 
if it is worth using both of them alternatively, depending on the situation.

Alain LaBonti
Quibec


A 13:31 2002-02-11 -0500, Fisher, Dave a icrit :
>I use it like the others stated for remote access via a 56kb modem.
>
>Trying to run Vanilla VNC over 56kb modems was to slow to get anything done.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Moreland, Julius [mailto:Julius.Moreland "at" ci.corvallis.or.us]
>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:01 PM
>To: 'vnc-list "at" uk.research.att.com'
>Subject: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
>
>
>I am considering deploying this to our clients in place of VNCr9.
>
>Does anyone have an opinion on this version of Tight VNC?
>
>Any raves or rants?
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, mail majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com with the line:
>'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
>See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, mail majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com with the line:
>'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
>See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mail majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------