TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?

[Freddy Jensen]

   >From: "Moreland, Julius" <Julius.Moreland "at" ci.corvallis.or.us>
   >Date: Fri Feb 8 2002 10:06am
   >To:   "'vnc-list "at" uk.research.att.com'" <vnc-list "at" uk.research.att.com>
   >Subj: TightVNC 1.2.2, is it beneficial?
   >
   >I am considering deploying this to our clients in place of VNCr9.
   >
   >Does anyone have an opinion on this version of Tight VNC?
   >
   >Any raves or rants?
   >---------------------------------------------------------------------
   >To unsubscribe, mail majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com with the line:
   >'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
   >See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
   >---------------------------------------------------------------------


I actually purchased (paid real money) for a version
of TridiaVNC. I have run a few tests with it over my
home DSL line, but it is difficult to see if there is
any speed improvement at all. It seems like the one thing
that improves performance the most is restricting pixel
values to 8bit on the client side. Although the downside
is that it offsets the colors somewhat.

Freddy

--
Freddy Jensen, Sr. Computer Scientist, Adobe Systems Incorporated
345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110-2704, USA, Ph: (408) 536-2869
Email: jensen "at" adobe.com, URL: http://www.adobe.com
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mail majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com with the line:
'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------