TightVNC vs regular VNC

Yan Seiner yan "at" cardinalengineering.com
Mon, 06 Aug 2001 16:04:05 +0000


Only if it's a windows box....  No prob w/ linux.  :-)

--Yan

David Brodbeck wrote:

> My biggest problem is that the machine that it'd be most useful on is one
> that we've shipped off to a site 1200 miles away, and something tells me
> that I can't upgrade to a newer VNC while operating the machine via VNC. ;)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edric Bulalacao [mailto:egb "at" tonesoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:14 AM
> To: vnc-list-digest "at" uk.research.att.com
> Subject: RE: TightVNC vs regular VNC
> 
> 
> My findings were based on the latest preview source code of Tight
> VNC...downloaded from www.tightvnc.com.  Indeed, if bandwidth is your main
> concern, then go with Tight VNC and play around with the Custom and JPEG
> compression levels and the mouse cursor thingie.  But in addition, you'll
> need to consider the additional server resources that these options
> consume...more CPU utilization and additional memory requirements per user.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
> to majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com
> See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to majordomo "at" uk.research.att.com
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------