68K port? (Was: RE: MacVNC Beta 2)

[Charlie McLachlan]

On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Rui Carmo wrote:

> Erm.... Any chance of a 68K port? That way I could use that Mac II I have
> lying around... 8')

The actaul processor dependant bits (basically how the patch interfaces
with the server) should be reasonably easy to port but the biggest problem
is going to be OpenTransport. The server needs 1.1.3 and won't currently
run with MacTCP.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Charlie McLachlan - Responsible for VNC on the Mac
	AT&T Research Lab. Cambridge.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The VNC mailing list - see http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------