Push vs Pull connections.........

[Carroll, Patrick S]

On a practical side of things, I don't think this really matters.  You can
call it the server or the client or whatever.  Let's get back to more
constructive discussions.

Patrick Carroll
Instrument Technical Support
ASci Automation
Office: 483-7124  International: 703-7124 Mobile Phone: 272-5692 
Text Pager: http://griwww.glaxo.com/src/personalPages/show/psc59782
Unsecure Personal Email: mailto:Patrick.S.Carroll "at" gte.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Kenneth Albanowski [SMTP:kjahds "at" kjahds.com]
> Sent:	Monday, November 09, 1998 2:13 PM
> To:	John Cavanaugh
> Cc:	Alan Cox; vnc-list "at" orl.co.uk
> Subject:	Re: Push vs Pull connections.........
> 
> On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, John Cavanaugh wrote:
> 
> > Once the connection is established your statement about no difference is
> true. 
> > But their is a big difference in how they intially connect.  That is the
> > feature I am interested in.  Maybe the distinction is in what I describe
> as
> > push, perhaps I should call it a "Server Initiated Connection to Client"
> rather
> > than the more common usage of "Client Connection Initiated to Server".
> 
> In that case, it seems like you might be interested in
> <http://www.orl.co.uk/vnc/internalversion.html>. 
> 
> -- 
> Kenneth Albanowski (kjahds "at" kjahds.com, CIS: 70705,126)
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The VNC mailing list     -   see http://www.orl.co.uk/vnc/intouch.html
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The VNC mailing list     -   see http://www.orl.co.uk/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------