David A Vincent
davidv "at" hsa.com.au
Thu, 19 Mar 1998 22:24:10 +0000
Stefan Hudson <hudson "at" mbay.net> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 1998 at 03:19:15PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> >know if the other X clients and JAVA clients could project a local
> >cursor and if the WinVNC server could capture the cursor
> >and make sure it's not shown?
> Actually, I prefer it the way it is... seeing the actual remote cursor
> makes it easy to tell how lagged you are over the connection. The local
> (client side) cursor points to where you want to go, the remote cursor
> shows where the remote machine actually IS. I don't find it too
> confusing to have two cursors.
> My experience is only between an NT server and a Unix client... it may
> behave differently on other platforms?
I find the two cursors all but locked together when I use a Solaris
Xvnc and a vncviewer running on 95, NT or Solaris. With a WinVNC, the
viewer remote cursor is routinely lagging behind the viewer local
I am happy with this situation.
Perhaps if vncviewer programmers wanted to get fancy, the vncviewer
could monitor the lag and only display the local cursor when the lag
reached a pre-set level.
On a related issue, I have noticed that with the WinVNC (server) the
viewer does not always display the precise same cursor displayed on
the server machine's monitor. For example, when resizing a Windows 95
window, I don't see the varous double arrow cursors depending on which
edge of the window I point at. Instead, I see the cursor one normally
gets when changing the width of a column in a table (like a file
This does not happen with Xvnc.
David A Vincent <mailto:davidv "at" hsa.com.au> JUNK E-MAIL NOT WELCOME
Working (not speaking) for Hydrographic Sciences Australia Pty Ltd
HSA phone extension number 27 within HSA, web site <http://marilyn/>
GCS C++++$ US++$ P+$ E++$ W++ N+++ w--- M++ Y+ PGP+ t-- G e++ h--- b+++